Blogs
Rhapsody Unfulfilled…The Difference Between Loving Companion and Ball-and-Chain by Carnell Jones | Rhapsody Unfulfilled…The Difference Between Loving Companion and Ball-and-Chain by Carnell Jones |
|
|
|
| Written by Foresight | |
| Tuesday, 25 March 2008 | |
|
We have a situation that some of us may know all too well… The storybook boy meets girl … Our two subjects become comfortable to the point that sharing secrets is no longer an issue, like it almost happens on accident. Life is good, or so it would seem. Time passes, our subjects get older and the girl has become so enamored with this boy. She finds herself thinking about “one day when” - looking at girlfriend’s children, engagement rings, and other accoutrements of a future that she covets to share with this boy whom she loves. Conversely, the boy begins to feel like the girl is becoming too comfortable or involved in his life that was up to this point, all his own. His own friends, family, home, dog, are not becoming “theirs”.
Now, because of the relationship that has formed, he is constantly faced with the reality that the entire way that his life up to this point is at risk of irrevocable modification. Our male subject is set at a crossroads of sorts, does he A) willingly allow himself to fall deeper into this relationship with this woman or B) take a step back to think or even plan an exit strategy. Now the scene has been set.
It is a very difficult idea for a man to explain to a woman that is in love with him that space doesn’t mean that he wants to “play around”, but that the relationship that has formed was more than he bargained for at the time. The discomfort placed on the formerly single male by the relationship -seeking female is a result from pressure to enter into type of connection that he may neither want nor be prepared to enter into. If a man is going to be involved and devoted to one woman, that is a decision that he must make on his own… and there is NOTHING that a woman can or should to expedite that decision. Comments
(2)
SO true...hard to believe and live in this type of truth. I am myself, a woman of learned "communal" behavior. Don't blame the woman...blame the society.
? as a woman i have to say that i think you've oversimplified (possibly distorted?) the so-called "female perspective" in your appraisal of this situation. i don't know if that's your point-- maybe you're just trying to talk about why (some?) men have a difficult time making a commitment-- but if you're mainly trying to explain the guys' POV, it might be a good idea not to try to get into a woman's side of the story. (note: not all women--or men-- have the same perspective or feel the same way about relationships, etc.-- so naturally it's hard to try to pin down "where [group of people] are coming from" in situations like these.)
i, for one, find commitment very difficult, for many of the reasons you cited regarding men's difficulty with it. it is hard to just be with one person when you can be with lots of others, sometimes you just want some space, etc. totally with you on that. i'd add as well that, as far as sex is concerned, it's hard because monogamy isn't really a natural tendency so much as a social ideal. even though I think it has lots of advantages over the alternatives, it requires a lot of energy to maintain. i think the real reason there is a difference between the ways men and women feel about it (at least, there seems to be based on how lots of folks in society discuss it) is because society gives men greater permission to pursue their sexual urges and desires than it gives women. (similarly, men have traditionally enjoyed way more latitude to pursue whatever other aspects of public and social life they find fulfilling than women have.) society is ok with male (hetero-) sexuality; it is still quite opposed to female sexuality, especially that which isn't harnessed solely for men's pleasure. if we lived in a society based on centuries of openness and acceptance of all forms of sexuality, and that granted men AND women the freedom to be openly sexual without being labeled, ostracized, and/or targeted for violence, i doubt we'd be having this conversation. at the very least, it wouldn't proceed as it typically does. maybe we'd be discussing how we all have trouble being "tied down"? Copyright 2007. All Rights Reserved. |
|
| Last Updated ( Monday, 24 March 2008 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Subscribe to our free week in review newsletter. The "name" field is optional.